Sunday, 11 April 2010

Third Crane Shoulder Design

This is the third design for the crane shoulder. The dimensions have been altered to fit the UB178x102x19 beam. The dimensions of the holes for the pins are currently arbitrary as I am awaiting the pin analysis, however all other elements are dimensioned correctly.

The following image is a comparison between the second (pictured to the left) and third (to the right) shoulder design.


This third design is described in more detail in the engineering drawing below.

The crane is now slightly taller than before, though with this standardised beam will have far more options concerning the choice of winch mechanism. The image below describes the assembled crane, without the beam pins.


Saturday, 10 April 2010

Full calculations for legs (corrected)






references : http://www.matweb.com
http://www.roymech.co.uk/Useful_Tables/Tribology/co_of_frict.htm
ps. i have already estimated the masses of the legs (see older blog)

Friday, 9 April 2010

Preliminary Research on Potential Beam Pins

Introduction
In this post I will examine the potential of Hex bolts, Clevis pins, and U bolts for the application of becoming the crane pin component. I will use preliminary research to identify strengths and weaknesses of each type, and attempt to draw a conclusion of which one to investigate in more detail.

HEX Bolts
The bolts used for the crane must be a standard dimension and strong enough to withstand the forces applied when the crane is loaded. The first image is of the standard bolt measurement system and the second is of a table of standard dimensions and strengths. Note that the dimensions shown are all prior to coating and thus slightly undersized, and that all images were obtained from the same article which is referenced at the end.





This article also dealt with nuts and washers. The information is shown in the images below and will be used as a start point in finding the ideal bolt/washer/nut combination should the group decide to use HEX bolts for the crane pins.





http://www.mbw.co.uk/documents/factsheets/Non-Preload.pdf

The material that the bolts are made from also contributes considerably to their yield strengths. The following table was taken from a manufacturers website and applies to M16 HEX bolts. Further research will be conducted to assist the group in deciding the type and size of crane pin to use.



http://www.boltdepot.com/fastener-information/Materials-and-Grades/Bolt-Grade-Chart.aspx

In conclusion, this preliminary research shows that HEX bolts do have potential for use as our crane pins. Depending on the type they have yield strengths of approximately of the order of 100MPa, have many optional standard dimensions, and are cheap to purchase (~£1 per unit referenced below). There may be an issue with the numbers of small washers and nuts that would be required however, as these may easily be lost in a disaster relief environment.

http://uk.rs-online.com/web/search/searchBrowseAction.html?method=retrieveTfg&Ne=4294957938&Nr=AND%28avl%3auk%2csearchDiscon_uk%3aN%29&N=4294962569+4294955562+4294905479&Ns=stockPolicy_uk%7c1%7c%7cnew_uk%7c1&binCount=85&multiselectParam=4294962569%204294955562&selectAttribute=M20#breadCrumb

Clevis Pins
Clevis pins are ideal for fast assembly situations such as with this emergency crane. The pin slots in the hole and is fastened by a split pin or similar. The table below, sourced from a manufacturers website, details the dimensions of some standard Clevis pins.



http://www.automotioncomponents.co.uk/purchase.php?p_no=P1242

The pins may be fixed in a variety of ways such as split pins, hitch pins, and linch pins. The image below shows a section of different connection types for Clevis pins.



http://www.automotioncomponents.co.uk/purchase.php?p_no=P1242

In conclusion, Clevis pins are a better option than HEX bolts. The cost and yield strengths of the Clevis pins are approximately the same as for the HEX bolts, though they are considerable quicker to assemble and do not require washers.

U Bolts
U bolts are slightly stronger than Hex bolts or Clevis pins as they fit two holes connected in pairs. They have a slight advantage over the HEX bolts as their washers may also be doubled up, as depicted below.



www.sea-sure.co.uk/ubolt2.htm

There are many different designs of U bolt, the two main types of which are shown below, though for the application of the emergency crane the square bend U bolt is most appropriate.



http://www.clampsinc.com/guidelines%20for%20ubolts.htm#COLD%20DRAWING%20AND%20BOLT%20STRENGTH

In conclusion, U bolts would be better than HEX bolts as they require fewer washers. They also cost only slightly more than Hex bolts or Clevis pins, meaning that overall they are the cheapest option as one would only require half as many of them for the crane as a whole.

Summary
HEX Bolts:
Strength - Acceptable
Price - Moderate
Speed of Assembly - Slow
Number of Parts - High

Clevis Pins:
Strength - Acceptable
Price - Moderate
Speed of Assembly - Fast
Number of Parts - Low

U Bolts:
Strength - High
Price - Low
Speed of Assembly - Slow
Number of Parts - Moderate

Conclusion
The HEX bolts are not appropriate for this crane. They have too many small parts and a system using them would require too much time to assemble in an emergency situation. The U bolts are the cheapest and strongest, though the number of small parts which may be lost and the speed of assembly mean they would not be appropriate either.

Therefore I conclude that Clevis pins are the most appropriate pins for this emergency crane. They are reasonably priced, they are fast to assemble, and they have the least number of components of the crane pin types considered.

CAD UB178x102x19 Crane Beam

These are the CAD images and drawings of the UB178x102x19 Crane Beam. Firstly we have an image of the revised crane beam (left of image) compared to the UB178x102x19 Crane Beam (right of image).



In addition, here is the engineering drawing for this standard beam. The holes for the beam pins are M20 and just over three times the distance from the end of the beam as their diameter.



The use of a standard dimensioned beam will dramatically reduce cost, compared with a custom beam, and also make it considerably easier to find a winch system to fit the beam dimensions.

LIST

The following course of action will take place in order to finish work on the crane:

Design (Mark)

1. Need an exploded view of the design to see where each of the separate parts fit into the final assembly

2. Need to check/change some of the dimensions – e.g. boom to fit the UB 178x102x19 standard sizes and check the sizes of some of the struts for the legs to make sure there is enough clearance for overlapping parts

3. Check and select most appropriate design ideas from the posted list “changes to design” and apply to cad design

4. Find standard bolt and nut dimensions as some thread dimensions are not long enough to fit the nut, (consider extra space for a spring washer - to relieve friction, prevent loosening or distribute pressure) – (Jason & Jarrett provide assistance)

5. Post up the pages of the initial design sketches leading to the final crane design

6. Begin working on individual report section

Materials and analysis (Jason & Jarrett)- needs to be done BY MONDAY!!

1. Calculate the remaining stress values on the legs

2. Select a suitable aluminium alloy for the legs and calculate the mass- pass onto Abdi

3. For the selected structural steel grade S355 for the boom- find costs to assist Abdi

4. Calculate stress' on bolts/pins

5. Begin working on individual report section

Costs (Abdi)

Costs for aluminium alloys and steel
Bolts...

Beam pins

The beam pins are inefficiently designed, and will be changed on CAD shortly. They will be altered to a standard size HEX head bolt, such as one from the list show on the following link, to considerably reduce their cost in comparison to the cost of custom made pins.



http://uk.rs-online.com/web/search/searchBrowseAction.html?method=retrieveTfg&Ne=4294957938&Nr=AND%28avl%3auk%2csearchDiscon_uk%3aN%29&N=4294962569+4294955562+4294905479&Ns=stockPolicy_uk%7c1%7c%7cnew_uk%7c1&binCount=85&multiselectParam=4294962569%204294955562&selectAttribute=M20#breadCrumb

Another option for the pin design is to use a Clevis pin system



http://uk.rs-online.com/web/search/searchBrowseAction.html?method=browseSubRange&Ne=4294953839&N=4294947005&productNum=0838940

Alternatively, to reduce the number of components in the crane pack (as small parts may be lost) a U bolt system could be employed



http://uk.rs-online.com/web/search/searchBrowseAction.html?method=retrieveTfg&binCount=7&Ne=4294957561&Ntt=u+bolt&Ntk=I18NAll&Nr=AND%28avl%3auk%2csearchDiscon_uk%3aN%29&Ntx=mode%2bmatchallpartial&N=4294955388&Nty=1

The beam dimensions have once again been altered and so a revised CAD representation will also be posted here shortly, as well as any other changes to the design proposed by the stress analysis (including limits and fits which will be added as they are calculated)

Changes to design

Certain design features which need to be brought to the attention of the group, as could potentially reduce stresses on certain structures, increase stability or for safety. The following cases for consideration will be brought up in the next meeting:

The following alteration must be made:


Obtained from BS5950-12000part1

Nut and Bolt



Leg design



Hole design -choice



Matts